How 'National Parties' Win Without Winning

The BJP and Congress have together won more seats than they did in 2004. Does this mean that India is preferring these parties? No. Not at all. And for a change, the point is not about voter intoxication levels.

The process of elections in India being what it is, people often get confused between percentage of seats and percentage of votes. Although the Congress and BJP have together managed to gather more seats than in 2004, their share of votes hasn't gone up. Yogendra Yadav explains in The Hindu:
A national trend does not mean a trend in favour of national parties. The combined seat share of the Congress and the BJP has increased from 283 last time to 321, roughly the same the two parties had in 1998. But there is no sharp increase in their vote share. In 2004, the Congress and the BJP together polled 48.7 per cent of the total vote. According to the provisional figures available, the combined share of the big two parties is about the same: 48.9 per cent. Therefore, it is incorrect to suggest that the result signals a return to a time when national parties dominated.
So with a mere 0.4% increase in vote-share compared to the 2004 elections (from 48.7% to 48.9%), the two so-called 'national parties' - Congress and BJP - have gained 13.43% more seats (from 283 to 321). Hence, although 51.1% of India rejected 'national parties', these parties ended up taking 59.1% of the available 543 seats.

How is this possible?

For those who find this confusing, here's an explanation of how this is possible: since the election is a 'first past the post' system, it is actually possible for parties to add seats to their kitty even if their vote-share reduces. All you need is an increased fragmentation of votes.

So, since there is no increase in the vote-share of 'national parties', an increase in the total number of seats only points to an increased fragmentation. This election has seen a considerable increase in the number of state-parties (called 'regional parties' by some), thereby proving beyond doubt that there is an increase in political ambitions at the state level. At the same time, there is no increase in political ambitions at the India-level (since the number of so-called 'national parties' has not increased; it remains two).

The Congress rode on the back of state-parties

The Congress has been able to add more seats to its kitty because of sufficient fragmentation of votes in Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu due to Praja Rajyam, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena and Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam (all three state-parties and new entrants this year). At the same time, the Congress has benefited from aligning with the Trina Mool Congress and the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (both state-parties) in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu, respectively. So it was really a mix of divide and rule and unite-with and rule which enabled the Congress to win. One also recalls that both were practised by the British when they were ruling this part of the world.

When one takes into account the above facts, it should become sufficiently clear that India continues to reject 'national parties'. At the time of writing, 51.1% of India rejects them left, right and center. So much for claims of the 'emergence of national parties' and so much for claims that the "elimination of regional parties from national space has begun".

On the contrary, what has begun is the emergence of state-parties in the national space. The ones which are worth writing home about, we mean (unlike the JD(S)). It is because of these state-parties that 'national parties' are winning without winning. This, too, shall pass.

4 comments:

abhishek said...

one more article echoing what Karnatique is saying..
http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/politics/vote-share-of-national-parties-actually-slipping-comment_100194907.html

ಸುಮ್ಸುಮ್ಕೆ said...

Apparently it is seem not just enough if regional parties mushroom in their respective grounds, the public must out-mandate the national level parties as well..

For instance in TN this time, INC has lost 2 seats (between '04 & '09) - which seem to have been won by "some or the other regional party!" So here, apart from DMK & AIADMK winning more seats this time than '04, INC's seat share has declined too.

Unfortunately in KAR, that is not (yet) the case, for the vote/seat-share is a see-saw between two national parties only!

ಸುಮ್ಸುಮ್ಕೆ said...

In fact it seems as though we're standing on the peak of a bell curve here. A curve illustrating the illusionary raise in seat-share of national parties fueled by the fragmented nature of vote-share - thanks to the advent of many a regional party.

Does it then mean that we're soon going to accelerate down on the other side of this curve when regional party vote-shares start rising, vote fragmentation declining, and seat-shares begin imitating their vote-shares? That'll be the next election, eh?

BTW, I hope by then Karnataka has more MPs to vote for, and has more freedom to choose to bump up our MLA numbers too!! A louder Kannada voice in any hall of governance is always sweeter, isnt it?!

Chikkodi Chinnaswamy said...

I agree on Federal setup, state interests and most points which are discussed here.

But what state party choice do I (Kannadiga) have for the next election? Haven't we seen so many parties crop up, the way start up companies come to the fore during recession, just before the election and shut shop.

Where is that party which will do what it has to do for this region?

Post a Comment

 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...