Dissecting the Yash Pal Committee Report - Part I

Okay, so we finally get to our detailed commentary on the Yash Pal Committee report. We will do so in a series of posts. This is the first in the series.

The first thing we’d like to clarify to our readers is that the Yash Pal Committee was commissioned to analyze Higher Education in India and make recommendations for improving it. It was really none of its business to make the disappointing and brief commentary it did make about Secondary School Education, wherein it commented that we need to re-think on the “need to continue with” State Secondary Education Boards (which equates to the Department of Pre-University Education in Karnataka). In the context of the Yash Pal Committee report as applied to Karnataka, one must replace “Secondary School Education” with “Pre-University Education”, because it is the latter term which is understood here in Karnataka.

We understand that University Education cannot be completely oblivious of Pre-University Education, but even the little rigor one sees in the Yash Pal Committee’s analysis of University Education is found lacking in the casual paragraph it wrote about Pre-University Education. Since we have already analyzed the problems associated with, and the impossibility of, replacing the Department of Pre-University Education with a “GRE-like examination”, we will not re-visit it here. Instead, we will focus on the core topic of the Committee: Higher Education.

We disagree with the Committee's definition of a University

We now get on to the Committee’s understanding of what a University is – for it is from this that its recommendations about Higher Education arise. It is here that we differ with the Committee. We will not waste any time on the structural “revamping” suggested by the Committee such as merging the UGC and AICTE into one NCHER (National Commission for Higher Education and Research), because these structural changes, in our opinion, do not address the problem at its core - even though they certainly have the ability to make small improvements in the status quo. Challenging the IITs and IIMs too is bold and beautiful, but does not address the problem.

That’s why we’ve termed the Committee’s recommendations as an attempt to re-structure the same old vamp – the “vamp” being the definition of a University popular amongst post-independence influential educationists and thinkers in India. Since we cannot agree with that definition, no amount of systemic re-structuring based on the wrong definition can bring the system closer to ideality.

Two people who do not agree on the definition of a house must not discuss whether the Verandah and the Living Room must be merged into one room. It’s a waste of time. Our time is better invested in putting across our definition of a house, our definition of a University, and hoping that contemporary thinkers and policy-makers are open to evaluating our definition with an open mind - since we sincerely believe that our definition is most in-line with the development of Kannada, Kannadiga and Karnataka - and by induction of the whole of India.

Philosophical reconciliation always precedes implementational reconciliation. If the former is impossible, any attempt to do the latter is wasteful.

Next in series>>>

1 comment:

SocialCauseTN Tamil Nadu said...

ENFORCING SINGLE BOARD – NOT IN RIGHT DIRECTION

Please stop this enforcement of Single Board plan by Kapil Sibil at all cost. Already, in India, all establishments are held by Central Government and State Governments are just puppets at the hands of the Center. There is not much to loose and we are fighting here for de-centralization and a Federal India Setup. And the Central Government is trying to get more control out of States.

Unlike the past, unfortunately, our people also does not care much for the protection of our language, cultural and historical heritage. Parents who presume themselves as elite does not mind if their kids does not know their Language or culture\History at all. Currently, we have our language and culture preserved in our rural areas only. Let that also not be wiped out. Elite English media and elite english people in our own place supports single board without worrying about the impact of that move on our language and culture. They have absolutely no sensitivity for our language, it’s rich culture and history.

Let education of our kids be at the hands of our State Government. We can work on modernizing of our State educational system to boost quality. Our State Governments can institute a committee for that. Leaving control of our children’s education to the Central Government will be a disaster for the States as it will slowly wipe out our language and history that needs to be passed from generation to generation. Even if the Central Government says, they will teach the State history, we can’t accept as we are anyway better than them in telling our history to our kids.

Tamil Nadu is seen as the foremost State in India that has fought hard to retain it’s language, culture and uniqueness. These days, whatever happens, no voice are heard from the TN Government. Happy that, atleast, Maharashtra, Kerala and West Bengal raised their voices.

Post a Comment

 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...